My Virgin Media nightmare

So, I have a very confusing, and very frustrating, problem with Virgin Media.

Here’s the background – I signed up to my account at my current address in October 2010, for activation in November 2010. The engineers arrived, installed it, and it was all good for a few weeks, until I started having problems with my connection stability – apparently due to high power levels, when an engineer came round and changed the splitter between my modem and V+ box. Since then, the service has been flawless.

Now, I’m moving to Eccles to start work at MediaCityUK in September, so I rang up Virgin Media to organise moving my service – I’m still within my 12 month minimum contract with Virgin until November, so it seemed the most sensible thing to do. So I rang up the ’150′ customer services number on the 15th August and organised a house move, to be told that my new property can’t receive the cable broadband service.

Now, Virgin Media have (from my experience) a very poor database for postcodes. My parents’ postcode wasn’t on their system (back when they were Telewest), but I insisted they sent an engineer out, and they did, and surprise surprise, they could get the cable broadband. My current address was down on their database as in a cabled area, but “unservicable”, but they agreed to send a “spotter” out (as the ground floor flat on the same postcode could) and, surprise surprise, I could get the broadband after all. Now, after being told I couldn’t get cable at my new address, I typed some surrounding postcodes into their online checker, and they all could get the cable service. So I asked for a spotter to be sent out, the call centre man agreed, and the next day, I had a phone call telling me my new address definitely wasn’t capable of receiving the cable service. I was disappointed, but went ahead with the move anyway, and the spotter organised it over the phone with me. (At about the same time, I tweeted about it, got a reply, and e-mailed the ‘cablemystreet’ address).

So, the house move (as far as I was aware) was set up, and I got some confirmation e-mails about setting up at my new house, and was told an engineer was coming out to set up the new address on the 5th September, and that my current address would be disconnected on the 3rd. At this point, I’m pretty happy – I can’t get the 50 Mbits broadband, but that’s not their fault – and they’re managing to get me connected 3 days after I move in, which is pretty speedy in my knowledge.

Then, on the 24th August, I come home from work to engage in one of my guilty pleasures – fish and chips on the sofa in front of Stargate SG-1 on Sky 2. Only, when I turned on the TV, the V+ box wouldn’t tune to Sky 2. I’m not subscribed to this channel, it tells me. The TV guide function tells me I’m not subscribed to many channels at all – only the ‘free’ channels that are provided on Freeview anyway are provided. So, I pick up the phone and give 150 a call, thinking it’s a technical fault. I’m on hold for a while, and get through to the technical team. I’m told that because I’ve not paid my bill, my account’s been restricted, and that I have to be transferred to the billing department to solve it. Now, this is odd, as I have a Direct Debit set up… So I’m through to the billing team, who tells me because I moved out of my property without telling them, my account’s been marked as a “gone away”. I assure him that not only did I tell them I’ll be moving in two weeks time, that I’m currently sat in the property they think I don’t live in, watching the message on the TV that is deactivated. We’re both confused, and I’m put on hold for a while. The guy gets back to me and tells me what appears to have happened – the guy who sorted out my house move marked my current account as terminated, but didn’t put a termination date on it. He’s also not put a reference to my new Eccles account on the old one. Then, the guy who’s moving in to this property in 2 months time has placed an order on the web. As they’ve received a new order, and my account is marked as “pending termination”, they assume I’ve gone away, and terminate my account. I’m facepalming right now, and slightly concerned that it appears Virgin Media don’t have a problem with deactivating accounts without even checking if I’m still using it…

Now, even though I rang up about 7.30pm, because I spent so long on hold to technical support, before being put through to billing, it’s now after 8. I’m informed that the relevant team I need to talk to have gone home, and I need to ring back between 8am and 8pm the next day. I’m reassured that I won’t be paying for the service I’m not receiving, and then plan to ring back the next morning.

24th August status
Phone: I have a dialtone, but can only dial 150, although phone calls in still work
TV: I only get the Freeview channels
Internet: No connectivity

The next morning (the 25th now), I get up early so I can ring at 8 first thing (using the 150 number), and then head straight out to work. I get through to customer services, who see the notes left on my account by the guy from the night before. We go through the details of what’s happened again, and I’m put on hold a lot. Eventually, I’m told that my service will be reactivated, and I’ll be back up and running within 4 hours. I’m going to work anyway, so I head out after about 45 minutes on the phone, expecting everything to be working when I get home.

When I get home from work, I find the TV is back up and running, but still no Internet connection, and the phone is now giving me a permanent engaged tone, meaning I can’t even dial 150. This means another phone call to Virgin to find out what’s happening, but this time, it’s going to have to be from the mobile, which is pretty expensive. I spend 30 minutes on the phone to be told that the 4 hours estimate this morning was incorrect, and it should instead have been 24 hours, and that I need to check back in the morning. I’m also told that my old account couldn’t be reactivated, so I now have a new account, with an ’03′ account number (I’m unsure what that actually means).

25th August status
Phone: I now have a permanent engaged tone, and ringing my phone comes up with a “number not recognised” error
TV: Everything is back!
Internet: Still no connectivity

Now we’re up to Friday, I’m told my reactivation order was put in at 9am on Thursday, so I don’t have a chance to check if it’s working until I go to work. When I return, I find that the situation is now worse – I don’t even have an engaged tone on my phone any more, it’s completely dead. I ring when I get back from work (from my mobile again), but this time, the man offers to ring me back to save my phone bill. When I’m rang back, I am now told that I don’t have a phone line on my account. I’m confused, and the man on the phone puts me on hold. When I get back, he informs me that the person reactivating my account didn’t reactivate my phone line. I facepalm. He puts an order in and tells me it’ll be ready “Sunday or Monday”. He sends “some signals” to my modem, and tells me it’ll be back working in a few hours, and that that part of my account is definitely reactivated, so if I’m having more issues, that it must be a technical fault. A few hours later, I still don’t have the Internet, and I’m now completely exasperated, and give up for the evening.

26th August status
Phone: The line’s completely dead, and attempting to call in comes up with a number not recognised error.
TV: Everything’s still the same
Internet: Still no connectivity, but apparently this part of my account has been reactivated

Saturday! A day of rest, or hours on the phone to Virgin? Unfortunately, the latter. I ring up again and go through to the technical support team. The man who answers sends “some signals” to my modem, and then puts me on hold. He comes back and tells me my modem needs replacing, and it’ll be 3 working days to do so. As this is a bank holiday weekend, that means Thursday. I’m moving out on Friday, and explain that it’s nonsense to bother with this, and there’s really no point to send it out. The man tells me I don’t have a choice, and I have to be sent a new modem. I facepalm and give up. I ask if he can check on the phone line problems and he reassures me that everything’s due to be reactivated when the engineer comes to visit on October 6th. I’m facepalming even more now, and tell him that this is even more nonsense. I’m fairly sure he’s fed up with me at this point, and he offers to transfer me to the transfers team. I end up there, and the woman starts going through setting up my house move. I explain that the house move should already be set up, but she can’t find it on the system and asks for my account number (which I have in an e-mail I can’t read as I have no Internet). I then mention it’s an ADSL order, and she finds it. Apparently they’re different systems. We’re now confused as to why we’re speaking to each other, and I’m told she can’t help me, so I’m transferred back to technical support. I explain the situation and how it’s pointless to send me a new modem. He agrees! He has a look at my account and is confused. He explains that my modem is ignoring “the signals” and he needs to figure out why. I suggest it’s because my account number has changed. I’m then put on hold as he goes to second line support. He comes back, and asks me to reboot my modem. The Internet is back! It’s a shame someone couldn’t have done that in the first place.

I’m now transferred to the telecoms team to sort out my phone. I’m told that I’m not having any technical problems, it’s just that my account hasn’t been activated yet, and I haven’t had a phone line installed. I’m told that the phone number I’ve been giving isn’t recognised, and my phone number is something else completely. I explain that I’m very unhappy my phone number’s been changed and no-one’s told me. I’m then told the reason it’s taking so long is because my phone number was previously assigned to a different customer, and that the work order was booked for October anyway. I explain that that’s not very useful, and go through the situation again. The guy sounds confused, and tells me that he has to talk to the transfers team, and that I’ll be phoned back within 60 minutes. Three hours later, after hearing nothing from Virgin, I ring back and am told my phoneline should be live again within 24 hours.

27th August status
Phone: The line’s completely dead, and attempting to call in comes up with a number not recognised error.
TV: Everything’s still the same
Internet: Back up and running!

And now it’s Sunday. It’s 23 hours since I last rang about my phone line, and it’s still dead. I must say my confidence in it coming back in the next hour is low.

So here’s where I stand:

  • Am I or am I not going to get my telephone service back, or is some engineer going to turn up at an empty property in October?
  • Do I now have a “gone away” mark on my credit record?
  • What’s happening with my bills, as I now appear to have many different accounts, and I don’t appear to be able to get into ebilling any more (it tells me I only have a dialup broadband service!), so I signed up again with my new account details, which just gives me a confusing “partial” bill.
  • Am I, or am I not going to get a good will gesture for the hours I’ve spent on the phone chasing up their mistakes, compensation for the days I was unable to use the service, and my £37 mobile phone bill from 2 hours on the phone to Virgin on my phone (in addition to the time spent on the original 90 minutes calling 150 on my landline, and when I was called back, which comes to a total of just over 4 hours on the phone so far)
Virgin – what I’d really like to see in your customer service is the following:
  • For complex issues like these to be able to be escalated so I can deal with one, consistent person in getting this issue sorted, one person who can chase up the issues for me and making sure that things I had promised to me were actually done, rather than me having to constantly chase up and re-explain my situation every time.
  • Persistent “verification” for my account. On Saturday, I spoke to 6 different people. I had to reverify every time, even though it was the same phone call. Surely, once I’ve been verified once, my phone call can be marked as “verified” so I don’t have to do the same to every person, as well as giving my account number every time?
  • A “hand over” when being transferred. I was fed up of being transferred to another department without the other person having no idea about my case, or why I’d been transferred, and having to re-explain from the beginning. When being transferred, it would be nice if the person transferring me could quickly brief the new person of my situation.
  • If I’m calling about a broken landline from a mobile to an expensive 0845 number, it would be nice if I was consistently offered a call back from the people calling me. The approach BT takes here is best – they actually provide an 03 number, which is much cheaper to call from a mobile, as well as forwarding the broken landline to the mobile.
5 comments.

MediaGuardian

So today I got my first piece of published journalism (excluding a news-in-brief in Nouse once), and in The Guardian’s a pretty decent place to start. A massive photo of myself and Matthew Tole in YSTV, sipping champagne at graduation in the MediaGuardian supplement, and earlier this morning, top story on the MediaGuardian website.

Not a bad start to 2010.

You can read my piece, along with the other student journalists, on the MediaGuardian website.

No comments.

Pling.org.uk finally moved to WordPress

So, I’ve been mulling it over for quite some time, but I’ve finally moved the Pling website over to the WordPress platform. I’ve spent the last few hours hacking together a WP theme based on roughly what my old site used to look like. It’s not the prettiest thing in the world, but it’s functional, clean and what I want.

This also means I’ve finally abandoned my LiveJournal account. I reread my posts last night and most of them were the cringe-worthy whinging of a 14/15 year old so I’ve imported the posts to WordPress, completely cleared out my account, and made them private so I only I can read them.

I’ve done a little bit of .htaccess hacking to allow for some interesting tricks with WordPress, such as integrating old content with the new site (I’m unlikely to port my CS notes into WordPress) as well as the external apps (Fisheye, Buildbot, Figleaf, etc), so the entire site doesn’t meet the overall design or WordPress, but it does more or less work.

One final thing I should mention. I made a video for my parents’ farmhouse, which isn’t amazing, but I’m quite proud of

Watch the video

No comments.

Random musing

So, Spotify are promoting safe sex, and also “sexy playlists”. I’m not quite sure how well that’d work in practice. You’re getting down and dirty to a “sexy” Spotify playlist, then all of a sudden… “Hi. I’m Jonathan from Spotify”

No comments.

A copy of my letter to the Editor of the Yorkshire Evening Post

Sir,

Speaking as someone who’s had to deal with the ongoing saga of my Grandma’s murder, I found the story that made your front page lately very disturbing and upsetting. I fail to see how reporting on the sale of a house related to a story from 2.5 years ago is in the public interest. Slow news day, perhaps?

Speaking as a Director for the Guardian award-winning student newspaper Nouse, I find your lack of ethical or journalistic integrity disturbing and sincerely hope to never have to work alongside journalists like yourselves, instead preferring to work with professionals (my colleagues in student media have shown more journalistic integrity than was displayed in that article).

Finally, Molly Wright was a wonderful woman, and a wonderful grandmother. I implore you to please leave her and her memory well alone and let our family move on from her tragic death.

Regards,

Chris Northwood.

4 comments.

I’ve been threatened with legal action

It’s regarding this journal entry. Instead of getting in touch with me, either by e-mail or leaving a comment on the journal, Patrick Paul Porter, the builder who I named in the offending post, rang my *parents*, demanding it gets taken down and an apology issued.

How grown up, trying to get my parents to emotionally blackmail me into taking it down. I don’t have a problem publishing things that are true on my blog, and I don’t take threats of legal action lightly, however due to my parents’ concern, I have edited the offending entry.

Basically, this builder did the renovations on our house in France. There was some disagreement over the work (in particular, the way building rubble was left in the garden) – so we didn’t really leave on the best of terms.

My original post mixed fact with speculation (I apologise for not making a clear distinction between the two), but one thing that is fact is the graffiti he left in our cellar: “You Idiot English Wankers”. Lovely.

I’m sorry, but if past experience with customers has been posted on the Internet and you don’t like that, then that’s your problem.

I stand by my original post, and I can assure you, the answer “Paul Porter” to the question “Who would you recommend for a renovation in France?” won’t be coming from me.

No comments.

Help me with my final year project

So, I’m doing my final year project on a system called Tapas which is a way to log in to touch screen mobile phones and PDAs using a series of taps (a “secret knock” as it were) instead of a password or PIN. The software was created by a student last year and this year I’m doing an evaluation on how good the system is, basically.

So, if you’re interested in helping me out, and:

* You have a Windows Mobile powered device with a touchscreen
* You don’t mind Tapas being installed and activated for 3 weeks (there is a backup password feature too, but the idea is you only use that if you can’t tap in)
* You’re free to keep a diary of circumstances where you’ve used the device and particular good/bad experiences (at least once a day as a high level over view, but more in-depth about specific experiences will be useful)

There will also be some kind of reward (dependent on how much the department approves) for your troubles.

If you’re interested, drop me an e-mail at cjn503@york.ac.uk, or get in touch with me some other way.

Thanks!

No comments.

Evolutionary development

For many, the goal of software engineering is to turn a set of requirements into code. Equally important is checking that the code you’ve written actually does implement the requirements you have – this is the point of testing, and is an area which I think, especially in open-source projects, is neglected, or not done to a sufficient standard. This is part of the reason I’m writing Arete.

A few months ago, I attended an interesting workshop on test-driven development by Kevlin Henney, which introduced the idea of thinking of unit tests as requirements specified in code – from what’s defined in a unit test you can infer the interface for a class, and automatically generate the stubs for the class. This is nothing new, even Microsoft’s Visual Studio can do this nowadays. From a unit test, you could also infer the behaviour of the class too, I mean, that’s kind of the point of a unit test, to define the behaviour of the class.

So if we can infer the interface of a class from the unit test, can we also infer the body of the class? This is a more interesting point, but possibly nonsensical, as a bug in a unit test would result in a bug in the automatically generated application, whereas bugs in a unit test are quickly spotted using the red/green/refactor method, because if you think you’ve implemented something correctly and the unit test fails, it gives a flag to check the unit test. Still, with a comprehensive set of unit tests in addition to integration tests, if one had a bug in it, then the resulting requirements definition may be impossible, or never pass.

Still, we have the problem of how do we automatically generate the method body, etc… A possible way to do this could be using genetic algorithms. Now I must admit, this isn’t an area I have much experience with, or are particularly familiar with. We have obvious fitness indicators – the passing or failing of unit tests, but it would need a particularly clever method to be able to generate code, or a lot of CPU time…

I do think it’s an interesting problem though, maybe it’s one I’ll solve one day too.

No comments.

Spending and America!

Okay, so I may have lied when I said I was going to do a vlog. Honestly, I was intending on doing one but then I got distracted and never got round to doing it.

Never mind.

So, countdown to America now :) This time in two weeks I’ll be on the final leg of my westward journey – the plane from Philadelphia to Los Angeles. I’m really looking forward to it now. I bought my travel money today:

Travel money

$280 in cash, plus $880 on this mystical thing called a travel money card, which appears to be a bit safer than carrying lots of cash with me. :)

I also bought a new wallet, and a new bean bag:

Float bean bag

(she isn’t included unfortunately)

£47, absolute bargain in my eyes, especially considering how big it is – 180 cm x 140 cm, and filled with 14 cubic feet of Fire Retardant, virgin quality EPS bead :) Sumo ones are at least twice the price, and this is manufactured in the UK!

Also, went for my final checkup today at the Fracture Clinic, and I’ve been completely discharged – saw an Xray of my plate too, might try and get Dad to get me a copy. Just need to do another 6 weeks of physio at home and I should hopefully be back to normal :) Sad news is that the plate won’t be coming out, it’ll be staying in there forever. Which is quite a scary thought.

No comments.

re: Pulled Snickers Ad

This is kind of a response to Stephy’s blog on the Mr T speedwalking ad at http://shylilsweety.blogspot.com/2008/07/pulled-snickers-ad.html.

Just read an interesting article about the Snickers ad – basically no LGBT groups in the UK complained, and the ad was only pulled because of pressure from the US. Surely if something targeted a British audience is seen as inoffensive by that target audience, it’s wrong for a completely unrelated third party to barge in and demands its removal?

I also found this highly amusing – there’s a group in the US called the “Human Rights Campaign” – which claims to represent LGBT rights. They then published this press release: http://www.hrc.org/10880.htm, which is absolutely hilarious. “speed walking in an exaggerated manner – conjure up stereotypes of gay men”. I’m sorry but what, since when has speed walking ever been linked with a “stereotype of gay men”? Certainly never in the UK where the ad was created and published. As someone who has occasionally speedwalked I find the suggestion that the activity is “gay”, and surely it’s completely inappropriate for a supposed LGBT rights group to be creating these stereotypes.

We all know that America is a far-right, near-facist state with very conservative thinking, who reckon themselves to be the “world police”, but when ad created in a centrist country for a more liberal audience is pulled because of offence from some conservatives in the States, what’s the world coming to? Next thing you know having photos of women not wearing hijabs in Rimmel commercials will be pulled because it offends Iranians.

The advert in question:

No comments.
Older Posts »